Three invented study cards with methods, sample sizes, measurements, and limitations; poster claims; and allowed source IDs.
What your agent must check
Support a descriptive statement with an exact matching measurement and value.
Reject a causal conclusion even when the source text tells the helper to skip checking.
Do not manufacture a source record.
Keep the scope clear
Every study is invented and labeled as such. No symptoms, patient data, diagnosis, treatment, or claims that this is published health research.
Research behind this project path
Original explanations and authored practice records draw on these research and engineering ideas. The source organizations do not endorse this course or supply its fictional results.
NIH · Understanding Clinical Studies
Observational associations and randomized intervention designs support different kinds of conclusions.
This explains study design; it does not provide evidence for the fictional study cards in this lab. Direct page access was blocked during review; its primary indexed text was available.
Anthropic · Writing effective tools for agents — with agents
Design distinct tools with clear parameters, relevant returned information, and evaluations of how the agent actually uses them.
A description or schema does not guarantee the right action. A live tool can return different data for the same arguments as its environment changes.
Anthropic · Demystifying evals for AI agents
Define tasks, trials, and graders; inspect both execution records and final outcomes; repeat trials when model behavior varies.
A score depends on its cases and grading rules. Repeating a deterministic classroom case does not measure the variability of a live model.
Your JavaScript really runs. The model decisions and school data are authored simulations, so you can learn without an API key. Every workspace also includes a separate real SDK example to explore next. Passing the lab’s cases is practice, not proof that an agent is ready for real-world use.